Posts Tagged ‘bill clinton’

Overselling Your Story

Sunday, January 27th, 2008

Bill and Hillary Clinton appear to have made a major miscalculation last week. They oversold their “feud” with Barack Obama. And they did it in a way that didn’t play well with their audience.

That’s my take on the lopsided results for Saturday’s vote in South Carolina. Will it hurt Hillary’s campaign beyond South Carolina? I have no idea.

Here’s the bottom line for you and me. We all want to sell our stories. But “overselling” them is a mistake that can actually do you harm.

Push too hard on a story that doesn’t interest reporters and they’ll see you as a nuisance. Push too hard on a story that doesn’t interest reporters and that they don’t believe is true and they’ll see you as dishonest. And that means you’ll lose their trust.

The Clintons oversold a story that made them look dishonest. Don’t replicate their mistake.

That’s my two cents’ worth. What’s yours?Jerry Brown

Duking It Out With Reporters

Sunday, January 20th, 2008

Bill Clinton and Mitt Romney found themselves in confrontations with reporters last week. I’ve been there a few times myself. Maybe you have, too. It’s generally a bad idea. But not always.

Romney got into it with an AP reporter in South Carolina who challenged his claim that “I don’t have lobbyists running my campaign.” Clinton went after a TV reporter who suggested his wife’s campaign was behind a lawsuit by the Nevada teachers’ union concerning participation in the state’s political caucuses.

When he’s on, nobody’s better at telling his story than Clinton. But he’s been tangling with reporters a lot recently – enough so that some other prominent Democrats and people connected with his wife’s campaign are urging him to chill out a bit. That’s good advice.

One of the most common mistakes people make with reporters is developing a fortress mentality because they assume reporters are out to get them. It can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

You don’t have to like the reporters who are covering you. But you do have to work with them. That doesn’t mean you should ignore mistakes or biases by reporters. But picking fights whenever they ask a question you don’t like – as Clinton did in this case – is asking for bad coverage.

Romney made a different mistake. The reporter who challenged his no-lobbyists-running-my-campaign claim injected his own point of view into their exchange. But Romney would have been better off moving on instead of engaging in a debate. The exchange was captured on video and played on TV. And it was pretty clear by the time it was done that Romney was making a distinction that won’t matter in the minds of many. The fact is he has several lobbyists serving as high-level advisers, although they’re not “running” the campaign.

Here’s the bottom line: You’re entitled to express your point of view, whether reporters agree with it or not. You’re also entitled to point out mistakes to reporters. And you’re entitled to defend yourself against unfair accusations.

But, with some exceptions, you’re almost always better off staying factual and avoiding emotional, heated exchanges. You won’t win those. And, when all is said and done, the reporter’s the one who writes the story.

That’s my two cents’ worth. What’s yours?

Like what you read here? Then visit my eStore. It’s open for business. Buy early and often.